-
Table of Contents
“Tahadi” Rejects the Current Dialogue Preparation Approach and Calls for Genuine Inclusion of All Local Forces
Growing Concerns Over the Dialogue Process
The “Tahadi” political movement has voiced strong objections to the current methodology adopted for preparing the upcoming national dialogue. In a recent statement, the movement criticized what it described as a unilateral and exclusionary approach that fails to reflect the diversity and complexity of the local political landscape. According to “Tahadi,” the current process lacks transparency and does not provide a fair platform for all stakeholders to contribute meaningfully.
The movement emphasized that any national dialogue must be built on a foundation of inclusivity and mutual respect. It warned that proceeding with a flawed preparatory process could undermine the credibility of the dialogue and deepen existing divisions. “Tahadi” stressed that the current approach risks turning the dialogue into a mere formality rather than a genuine opportunity for national reconciliation and reform.
Demands for Inclusive Participation
In its statement, “Tahadi” outlined several key demands aimed at ensuring a more balanced and effective dialogue process. The movement called for the immediate revision of the preparatory framework to allow for the active participation of all local political, social, and civil forces. It argued that only through broad-based engagement can the dialogue produce outcomes that are representative and sustainable.
- Revising the dialogue framework to ensure transparency and fairness
- Guaranteeing equal representation for all political and social groups
- Establishing clear mechanisms for decision-making and accountability
- Creating an independent body to oversee the dialogue process
“Tahadi” also highlighted the importance of involving youth, women, and marginalized communities in the dialogue, noting that their voices are often overlooked despite their critical role in shaping the country’s future.
Warning Against Marginalization and Political Monopoly
The movement warned that the current trajectory of the dialogue preparation could lead to the monopolization of the political process by a limited number of actors. It expressed concern that such an outcome would not only alienate large segments of the population but also jeopardize the prospects for long-term stability and democratic development.
“Tahadi” urged all national and international stakeholders to support a more inclusive and participatory approach. It called on the organizers of the dialogue to reconsider their strategy and to engage in genuine consultations with all relevant parties before moving forward.
Conclusion: A Call for Genuine National Consensus
In conclusion, “Tahadi” reaffirmed its commitment to constructive dialogue and national unity but insisted that these goals can only be achieved through a process that is inclusive, transparent, and representative of all local forces. The movement’s stance serves as a reminder that sustainable political solutions require the active involvement of all segments of society, not just a select few. As the country moves toward a critical juncture, the call for genuine participation and equitable dialogue has never been more urgent.
